A Canton man, acting as an insurance adjuster, was sentenced to three years in prison for stealing $108,000 from a couple after their home was destroyed by fire.
An Arizona court ruling allows Mexico to pursue legal action against US gun dealers accused of contributing to violence through gun trafficking, highlighting a critical cross-border issue.
In a legal settlement with a Black couple, mortgage lender loanDepot commits to policy changes after accusations of racially biased appraisal practices.
The Washington Supreme Court’s recent decision clarifies that all-risk policies cover damages caused by a covered peril, even if initiated by an excluded peril like faulty workmanship.
Discover the world of claims adjusters as they navigate challenging interactions with claimants, revealing the complexities behind insurance claims processing.
A Commonwealth Court rules that a minor truck fire, extinguished quickly without injury, does not constitute an abnormal working condition for truck drivers.
A Nassau County judge accuses a Florida insurance company of stonewalling policyholders and ignoring court orders, highlighting a broader issue with claim disputes.
The Justice Department and state attorneys general take legal action against Apple, alleging anticompetitive practices in smartphone markets to protect consumer interests and promote innovation.
Experienced adjusters call for their peers to better defend adjustments, highlighting concerns over recent training quality and ethical standards in claim handling.
Cedar Point to pay $50,000 and revise employee housing policy after being found guilty of discriminating against workers over 40, following an EEOC lawsuit.
A lawsuit filed in US District Court claims Ferrari failed to adequately fix a potentially dangerous brake defect in several models, including the 458 Italia.
With $1.2 billion spent on mass tort TV ads in a single year, experts warn the insurance industry to heed the potential litigation risks these ads represent.
In a pivotal decision, Oregon’s Supreme Court reversed lower courts, emphasizing the need for clear, unequivocal language in tort liability waivers within contracts.